The article by Sutanto and colleagues presented a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of adults living with SLE. In qualitative research and reviews, findings strictly depend on researchers perspectives and questions. From a social psychology perspective, we suggest that an interesting point of view for considering the growing corpus of qualitative studies, would be the social representation theory, with a specific focus on metaphors that patients adopt to describe their condition. In an extensive literature review, we identified three main metaphors used by professionals to describe lupus related diseases: ‘the wolf’, ‘the monster Hydra’ and the ‘butterfly’, each of them emphasizing specific disease aspects and manifestations. However, the professionals’ perspective represents just half of the picture. Which are the common representations of the disease shared by patients? Are they related with an wild beast they can fight (wolf), a unbeatable terrifying monster (like Hydra), or a peaceful animal to live with (like a butterfly)? We suggest that future review of qualitative studies with SLE patients, will be able to answer more specific questions, clarifying the use of representations in the light of illness severity, coping strategies and acceptance of the disease. This kind of research will help clinicians in providing useful information to patients, but avoiding distressing or frightening disease representations.

Mazzoni, D., Marchetti, L., Cicognani, E. (2014). Metaphors and representations of Systemic Lupus Erithematosus (SLE). A comment on the article by Sutanto et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 66(4), 647-648 [10.1002/acr.22229].

Metaphors and representations of Systemic Lupus Erithematosus (SLE). A comment on the article by Sutanto et al

Mazzoni, D;
2014

Abstract

The article by Sutanto and colleagues presented a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies that explored the experiences of adults living with SLE. In qualitative research and reviews, findings strictly depend on researchers perspectives and questions. From a social psychology perspective, we suggest that an interesting point of view for considering the growing corpus of qualitative studies, would be the social representation theory, with a specific focus on metaphors that patients adopt to describe their condition. In an extensive literature review, we identified three main metaphors used by professionals to describe lupus related diseases: ‘the wolf’, ‘the monster Hydra’ and the ‘butterfly’, each of them emphasizing specific disease aspects and manifestations. However, the professionals’ perspective represents just half of the picture. Which are the common representations of the disease shared by patients? Are they related with an wild beast they can fight (wolf), a unbeatable terrifying monster (like Hydra), or a peaceful animal to live with (like a butterfly)? We suggest that future review of qualitative studies with SLE patients, will be able to answer more specific questions, clarifying the use of representations in the light of illness severity, coping strategies and acceptance of the disease. This kind of research will help clinicians in providing useful information to patients, but avoiding distressing or frightening disease representations.
Lettera in rivista
Systemic Lupus Erithematosus; illness representations
English
2014
66
4
647
648
reserved
Mazzoni, D., Marchetti, L., Cicognani, E. (2014). Metaphors and representations of Systemic Lupus Erithematosus (SLE). A comment on the article by Sutanto et al. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 66(4), 647-648 [10.1002/acr.22229].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2014_Mazzoni_Cicognani_Marchetti_AC&R.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Dimensione 34.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
34.1 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/222072
Citazioni
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
Social impact