This paper presents some results devoted to providing network analysis functionalities for vulnerability assessment in public transportation networks with respect to disruptive events and/or targeted attacks to stations. The results have been obtained on two public transportation networks: the bus network in Florence, Italy, and the transportation network in the Attika region, Greece. The analysis implements a topological approach, based on graph theory, using a multi-graph to model public transportation networks and analyse vulnerabilities with respect to the removal of one or more of their components. Both directed attacks and cascading failures are considered. While the first type of disruptive events is related to a static analysis, where nodes are removed according to a rank related to some centrality measures, the second type is related to a dynamic analysis, where a failure cascade is simulated making unavailable the node with the highest betweenness value. Vulnerability measures are computed as loss of connectivity and efficiency, with respect to both the two different types of disruptive events considered. This study allows to evidence potential vulnerabilities of the urban networks, that must be considered to support the planning process into the creation of resilient structures

Candelieri, A., Galuzzi, B., Giordani, I., Archetti, F. (2019). Vulnerability of public transportation networks against directed attacks and cascading failures. PUBLIC TRANSPORT, 11(1), 27-49 [10.1007/s12469-018-00193-7].

Vulnerability of public transportation networks against directed attacks and cascading failures

Candelieri, A;Galuzzi, BG
;
Giordani, I;Archetti, F
2019

Abstract

This paper presents some results devoted to providing network analysis functionalities for vulnerability assessment in public transportation networks with respect to disruptive events and/or targeted attacks to stations. The results have been obtained on two public transportation networks: the bus network in Florence, Italy, and the transportation network in the Attika region, Greece. The analysis implements a topological approach, based on graph theory, using a multi-graph to model public transportation networks and analyse vulnerabilities with respect to the removal of one or more of their components. Both directed attacks and cascading failures are considered. While the first type of disruptive events is related to a static analysis, where nodes are removed according to a rank related to some centrality measures, the second type is related to a dynamic analysis, where a failure cascade is simulated making unavailable the node with the highest betweenness value. Vulnerability measures are computed as loss of connectivity and efficiency, with respect to both the two different types of disruptive events considered. This study allows to evidence potential vulnerabilities of the urban networks, that must be considered to support the planning process into the creation of resilient structures
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Public transport system; Network analysis; Vulnerability; Cascading failure
English
giu-2019
2019
11
1
27
49
reserved
Candelieri, A., Galuzzi, B., Giordani, I., Archetti, F. (2019). Vulnerability of public transportation networks against directed attacks and cascading failures. PUBLIC TRANSPORT, 11(1), 27-49 [10.1007/s12469-018-00193-7].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Article_PT.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Dimensione 1.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.58 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Candelieri2019_Article_VulnerabilityOfPublicTransport.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 2.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.14 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/220832
Citazioni
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
Social impact