The journalist’s protection under Art. 10 ECHR cannot automatically be removed by virtue of a source’s own conduct. Source protection applies even when a source’s identity is known. Having regard to the importance of the protection of journalistic sources for press freedom in a democratic society and the potentially chilling effect an order of source disclosure has on the exercise of that freedom, a judicial order aimed to obtain the disclosure of the journalist’s source, even when the source revealed freely this information, cannot be compatible with Art. 10 of the Convention unless it is justified by an overriding requirement in the public interest.
De Gregorio, G. (2018). Disclosing Journalistic Sources Already Revealed. The Becker v. Norway Case. MEDIA LAWS(3), 386-393.
Disclosing Journalistic Sources Already Revealed. The Becker v. Norway Case
De Gregorio, G
2018
Abstract
The journalist’s protection under Art. 10 ECHR cannot automatically be removed by virtue of a source’s own conduct. Source protection applies even when a source’s identity is known. Having regard to the importance of the protection of journalistic sources for press freedom in a democratic society and the potentially chilling effect an order of source disclosure has on the exercise of that freedom, a judicial order aimed to obtain the disclosure of the journalist’s source, even when the source revealed freely this information, cannot be compatible with Art. 10 of the Convention unless it is justified by an overriding requirement in the public interest.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
G. De Gregorio.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione
333.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
333.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.