Among different characteristics of knowledge bases, data quality is one of the most relevant to maximize the benefits of the provided information. Knowledge base quality assessment poses a number of big data challenges such as high volume, variety, velocity, and veracity. In this article, we focus on answering questions related to the assessment of the veracity of facts through Deep Fact Validation (DeFacto), a triple validation framework designed to assess facts in RDF knowledge bases. Despite current developments in the research area, the underlying framework faces many challenges. This article pinpoints and discusses these issues and conducts a thorough analysis of its pipeline, aiming at reducing the error propagation through its components. Furthermore, we discuss recent developments related to this fact validation as well as describing advantages and drawbacks of state-of-the-art models. As a result of this exploratory analysis, we give insights and directions toward a better architecture to tackle the complex task of fact-checking in knowledge bases

Esteves, D., Rula, A., Reddy, A., Lehmann, J. (2018). Toward veracity assessment in RDF knowledge bases: An exploratory analysis. ACM JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION QUALITY, 9(3), 1-26 [10.1145/3177873].

Toward veracity assessment in RDF knowledge bases: An exploratory analysis

Rula, Anisa
Secondo
;
2018

Abstract

Among different characteristics of knowledge bases, data quality is one of the most relevant to maximize the benefits of the provided information. Knowledge base quality assessment poses a number of big data challenges such as high volume, variety, velocity, and veracity. In this article, we focus on answering questions related to the assessment of the veracity of facts through Deep Fact Validation (DeFacto), a triple validation framework designed to assess facts in RDF knowledge bases. Despite current developments in the research area, the underlying framework faces many challenges. This article pinpoints and discusses these issues and conducts a thorough analysis of its pipeline, aiming at reducing the error propagation through its components. Furthermore, we discuss recent developments related to this fact validation as well as describing advantages and drawbacks of state-of-the-art models. As a result of this exploratory analysis, we give insights and directions toward a better architecture to tackle the complex task of fact-checking in knowledge bases
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Benchmark; Data quality; DeFacto; Exploratory data analysis; Fact checking; Linked data; Trustworthiness; Information Systems; Information Systems and Management
English
2018
9
3
1
26
16
partially_open
Esteves, D., Rula, A., Reddy, A., Lehmann, J. (2018). Toward veracity assessment in RDF knowledge bases: An exploratory analysis. ACM JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION QUALITY, 9(3), 1-26 [10.1145/3177873].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2017_FACT_CHECKING_JIDQ_Benchmark.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Dimensione 2.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.43 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
03j-Esteves2018.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.48 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.48 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/211374
Citazioni
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
Social impact