Background and Objectives: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. Previous studies showed that perceived social support has an important role in enhancing patient's quality of life (QOL). However, the precise mechanisms through which social support exerts such an effect are not completely understood. The aim of this paper is to test two alternative models explaining the relationship between social support (positive and problematic) and two dimensions of QOL: Health-Related (HR-QOL) and Non-Health-Related (NHR-QOL). Design: Model A (mediation) hypothesized that positive support would reduce stress while problematic support would increase stress), and that this in turn would reduce QOL. Model B (moderation) hypothesized that the effect of support on QOL would be moderated by the experience of stress in that more stressed individuals would show stronger effects. Methods: Three hundred and forty-four Italian patients with SLE completed an online questionnaire. Results: Stress partially mediated the relationship between support and QOL dimensions (either HR-QOL and NHR-QOL) thus supporting Model B. As hypothesized, positive support reduced stress, while problematic support increased stress. Conclusions: These findings help to explain the complex relationship between social support, stress and QOL in patients with SLE.

Mazzoni, D., Cicognani, E. (2016). Positive and problematic support, stress and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. ANXIETY, STRESS, AND COPING, 29(5), 542-551 [10.1080/10615806.2015.1134785].

Positive and problematic support, stress and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Mazzoni, D
;
2016

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease. Previous studies showed that perceived social support has an important role in enhancing patient's quality of life (QOL). However, the precise mechanisms through which social support exerts such an effect are not completely understood. The aim of this paper is to test two alternative models explaining the relationship between social support (positive and problematic) and two dimensions of QOL: Health-Related (HR-QOL) and Non-Health-Related (NHR-QOL). Design: Model A (mediation) hypothesized that positive support would reduce stress while problematic support would increase stress), and that this in turn would reduce QOL. Model B (moderation) hypothesized that the effect of support on QOL would be moderated by the experience of stress in that more stressed individuals would show stronger effects. Methods: Three hundred and forty-four Italian patients with SLE completed an online questionnaire. Results: Stress partially mediated the relationship between support and QOL dimensions (either HR-QOL and NHR-QOL) thus supporting Model B. As hypothesized, positive support reduced stress, while problematic support increased stress. Conclusions: These findings help to explain the complex relationship between social support, stress and QOL in patients with SLE.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
problematic support; quality of life; SLE; Social support; stress;
problematic support; quality of life; SLE; Social support; stress; Developmental and Educational Psychology; Clinical Psychology; Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); Psychiatry and Mental Health
English
2016
29
5
542
551
reserved
Mazzoni, D., Cicognani, E. (2016). Positive and problematic support, stress and quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. ANXIETY, STRESS, AND COPING, 29(5), 542-551 [10.1080/10615806.2015.1134785].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016_Mazzoni_Cicognani_Anxiety_Stress&Coping.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 1.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.25 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/210217
Citazioni
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
Social impact