People can maintain accurate representations of visual changes without necessarily being aware of them. Here, we investigate whether a similar phenomenon (implicit change detection) also exists in touch. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants detected the presence of a change between two consecutively-presented tactile displays. Tactile change blindness was observed, with participants failing to report the presence of tactile change. Critically, however, when participants had to make a forced choice response regarding the number of stimuli presented in the two displays, their performance was significantly better than chance (i.e., implicit change detection was observed). Experiment 3 demonstrated that tactile change detection does not necessarily involve a shift of spatial attention toward the location of change, regardless of whether the change is explicitly detected. We conclude that tactile change detection likely results from comparing representations of the two displays, rather than by directing spatial attention to the location of the change. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

Pritchett, D., Gallace, A., Spence, C. (2011). Implicit processing of tactile information: Evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 20(3), 534-546 [10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.006].

Implicit processing of tactile information: Evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm

GALLACE, ALBERTO;
2011

Abstract

People can maintain accurate representations of visual changes without necessarily being aware of them. Here, we investigate whether a similar phenomenon (implicit change detection) also exists in touch. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants detected the presence of a change between two consecutively-presented tactile displays. Tactile change blindness was observed, with participants failing to report the presence of tactile change. Critically, however, when participants had to make a forced choice response regarding the number of stimuli presented in the two displays, their performance was significantly better than chance (i.e., implicit change detection was observed). Experiment 3 demonstrated that tactile change detection does not necessarily involve a shift of spatial attention toward the location of change, regardless of whether the change is explicitly detected. We conclude that tactile change detection likely results from comparing representations of the two displays, rather than by directing spatial attention to the location of the change. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
implicit, touch, tactile, body, attention
English
2011
20
3
534
546
none
Pritchett, D., Gallace, A., Spence, C. (2011). Implicit processing of tactile information: Evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 20(3), 534-546 [10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.006].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/20726
Citazioni
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
Social impact