This paper contains a complete and updated review of the literature for multiobjective flowshop problems, which are among the most studied environments in the scheduling research area. No previous comprehensive reviews exist in the literature. Papers about lexicographical, goal programming, objective weighting, and Pareto approaches have been reviewed. Exact, heuristic, and metaheuristic methods have been surveyed. Furthermore, a complete computational evaluation is also carried out. A total of 23 different algorithms including both. owshop-specific methods as well as general multiobjective optimization approaches have been tested under three different two-criteria combinations with a comprehensive benchmark. All methods have been studied under recent state-of-the-art quality measures. Parametric and nonparametric statistical testing is profusely employed to support the observed performance of the compared methods. As a result, we have identified the best-performing methods from the literature, which along with the review, constitutes a reference work for further research
Minella, G., Ruiz, R., Ciavotta, M. (2008). A review and evaluation of multiobjective algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem. INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 20(3), 451-471 [10.1287/ijoc.l070.0258].
A review and evaluation of multiobjective algorithms for the flowshop scheduling problem
Ciavotta, M
2008
Abstract
This paper contains a complete and updated review of the literature for multiobjective flowshop problems, which are among the most studied environments in the scheduling research area. No previous comprehensive reviews exist in the literature. Papers about lexicographical, goal programming, objective weighting, and Pareto approaches have been reviewed. Exact, heuristic, and metaheuristic methods have been surveyed. Furthermore, a complete computational evaluation is also carried out. A total of 23 different algorithms including both. owshop-specific methods as well as general multiobjective optimization approaches have been tested under three different two-criteria combinations with a comprehensive benchmark. All methods have been studied under recent state-of-the-art quality measures. Parametric and nonparametric statistical testing is profusely employed to support the observed performance of the compared methods. As a result, we have identified the best-performing methods from the literature, which along with the review, constitutes a reference work for further researchFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JOC_final.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Dimensione
265.35 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
265.35 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.