Belgian Constitutional Court - Conflicts between regions, communities and the central government - Allocation of competences - Decisions with high political content - Degree of political alignment between the parties in litigation and judicial behaviour at the Court - Empirical testing - All decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court, 1985-2012 - Alignment between the alleged political preferences of the judges and the political affiliation of the Petitioner increases the rate of success of the latter.
Dalla Pellegrina, L., De Mot, J., Faure, M., Garoupa, N. (2017). Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court. EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW, 13(2), 305-346 [10.1017/S1574019617000050].
Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of Decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court
Dalla Pellegrina, L;
2017
Abstract
Belgian Constitutional Court - Conflicts between regions, communities and the central government - Allocation of competences - Decisions with high political content - Degree of political alignment between the parties in litigation and judicial behaviour at the Court - Empirical testing - All decisions of the Belgian Constitutional Court, 1985-2012 - Alignment between the alleged political preferences of the judges and the political affiliation of the Petitioner increases the rate of success of the latter.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
litigating-federalism-an-empirical-analysis-of-decisions-of-the-belgian-constitutional-court-.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione
438.25 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
438.25 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
