Objectives: To apply the Delphi exercise with iterative involvement of radiologists and pulmonologists with the aim of defining a structured reporting template for high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of patients with fibrosing lung disease (FLD). Methods: The writing committee selected the HRCT criteria—the Delphi items—for rating from both radiology panelists (RP) and pulmonology panelists (PP). The Delphi items were first rated by RPs as “essential”, “optional”, or “not relevant”. The items rated “essential” by < 80% of the RP were selected for the PP rating. The format of reporting was rated by both RP and PP. Results: A total of 42 RPs and 12 PPs participated to the survey. In both Delphi round 1 and 2, 10/27 (37.7%) items were rated “essential” by more than 80% of RP. The remaining 17/27 (63.3%) items were rated by the PP in round 3, with 2/17 items (11.7%) rated “essential” by the PP. PP proposed additional items for conclusion domain, which were rated by RPs in the fourth round. Poor consensus was observed for the format of reporting. Conclusions: This study provides a template for structured report of FLD that features essential items as agreed by expert thoracic radiologists and pulmonologists

Sverzellati, N., Odone, A., Silva, M., Polverosi, R., Florio, C., Cardinale, L., et al. (2018). Structured reporting for fibrosing lung disease: a model shared by radiologist and pulmonologist. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 123(4), 245-253 [10.1007/s11547-017-0835-6].

Structured reporting for fibrosing lung disease: a model shared by radiologist and pulmonologist

Harari, Sergio;Luppi, Fabrizio;Pesci, Alberto;
2018

Abstract

Objectives: To apply the Delphi exercise with iterative involvement of radiologists and pulmonologists with the aim of defining a structured reporting template for high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of patients with fibrosing lung disease (FLD). Methods: The writing committee selected the HRCT criteria—the Delphi items—for rating from both radiology panelists (RP) and pulmonology panelists (PP). The Delphi items were first rated by RPs as “essential”, “optional”, or “not relevant”. The items rated “essential” by < 80% of the RP were selected for the PP rating. The format of reporting was rated by both RP and PP. Results: A total of 42 RPs and 12 PPs participated to the survey. In both Delphi round 1 and 2, 10/27 (37.7%) items were rated “essential” by more than 80% of RP. The remaining 17/27 (63.3%) items were rated by the PP in round 3, with 2/17 items (11.7%) rated “essential” by the PP. PP proposed additional items for conclusion domain, which were rated by RPs in the fourth round. Poor consensus was observed for the format of reporting. Conclusions: This study provides a template for structured report of FLD that features essential items as agreed by expert thoracic radiologists and pulmonologists
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Consensus,High-resolution computed tomography, Lung fibrosis, Standardized report, Structured report
English
2018
123
4
245
253
open
Sverzellati, N., Odone, A., Silva, M., Polverosi, R., Florio, C., Cardinale, L., et al. (2018). Structured reporting for fibrosing lung disease: a model shared by radiologist and pulmonologist. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 123(4), 245-253 [10.1007/s11547-017-0835-6].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-184061.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 910.69 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
910.69 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/184061
Citazioni
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
Social impact