The 2 × 2 table is the simplest of data structures yet it is of immense practical importance. It is also just complex enough to provide a theoretical testing ground for general frequentist methods. Yet after 70 years of debate, its correct analysis is still not settled. Rather than recount the entire history, our review is motivated by contemporary developments in likelihood and testing theory as well as computational advances. We will look at both conditional and unconditional tests. Within the conditional framework, we explain the relationship of Fisher's test with variants such as mid-p and Liebermeister's test, as well as modern developments in likelihood theory, such as p * and approximate conditioning. Within an unconditional framework, we consider four modern methods of correcting approximate tests to properly control size by accounting for the unknown value of the nuisance parameter: maximisation (M), partial maximisation (B), estimation (E) and estimation followed by maximisation (E+M). Under the conditional model, we recommend Fisher's test. For the unconditional model, amongst standard approximate methods, Liebermeister's tests come closest to controlling size. However, our best recommendation is the E procedure applied to the signed root likelihood statistic, as this performs very well in terms of size and power and is easily computed. We support our assertions with a numerical study.

Ripamonti, E., Lloyd, C., Quatto, P. (2017). Contemporary frequentist views of the 2×2 binomial trial. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 32(4), 600-615 [10.1214/17-STS627].

Contemporary frequentist views of the 2×2 binomial trial

Ripamonti, E;Quatto, P
2017

Abstract

The 2 × 2 table is the simplest of data structures yet it is of immense practical importance. It is also just complex enough to provide a theoretical testing ground for general frequentist methods. Yet after 70 years of debate, its correct analysis is still not settled. Rather than recount the entire history, our review is motivated by contemporary developments in likelihood and testing theory as well as computational advances. We will look at both conditional and unconditional tests. Within the conditional framework, we explain the relationship of Fisher's test with variants such as mid-p and Liebermeister's test, as well as modern developments in likelihood theory, such as p * and approximate conditioning. Within an unconditional framework, we consider four modern methods of correcting approximate tests to properly control size by accounting for the unknown value of the nuisance parameter: maximisation (M), partial maximisation (B), estimation (E) and estimation followed by maximisation (E+M). Under the conditional model, we recommend Fisher's test. For the unconditional model, amongst standard approximate methods, Liebermeister's tests come closest to controlling size. However, our best recommendation is the E procedure applied to the signed root likelihood statistic, as this performs very well in terms of size and power and is easily computed. We support our assertions with a numerical study.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Approximate conditioning; Binomial trial; Conditional test; Exact tests; Fisher test; Liebermeister test; Mid-p test; Parametric bootstrap; Unconditional test; Statistics and Probability; Mathematics (all); Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
English
2017
32
4
600
615
reserved
Ripamonti, E., Lloyd, C., Quatto, P. (2017). Contemporary frequentist views of the 2×2 binomial trial. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 32(4), 600-615 [10.1214/17-STS627].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
17-STS627.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 749.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
749.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/182103
Citazioni
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
Social impact