Aim: Data on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) and its regression following renal revascularization are scanty. We performed a meta-analysis to provide comprehensive information on this clinically relevant issue. Methods: Full articles providing data on: LVH, as assessed by echocardiography, in RAS patients as compared with essential hypertensive counterparts; changes of left ventricular (LV) mass index after renal artery revascularization were considered. Results: A total of 905 study participants (RAS=446, essential hypertensive=459) of both sex were included in nine studies. Pooled LV mass index was higher in RAS than in essential hypertensive patients (140.4±11.1g/m 2 versus 121.8±6.2g/m 2, standard mean difference being 0.41±0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.51, P<0.001]. Among 360 RAS patients undergone renal revascularization from eight studies, baseline and post-intervention pooled mean LV mass index values were 129.0±10.2g/m 2 and 115.5±9.9g/m 2, respectively, the standard mean difference being-0.36±0.06 (95% CI from -0.47 to -0.25, P<0.001). These findings were unaffected by publication bias or single study effect. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates that RAS patients have an increased likelihood of LVH compared with essential hypertensive counterparts and renal artery revascularization has a beneficial effect on LV structure, as reflected by a significant decrease in LV mass index.

Cuspidi, C., Dell'Oro, R., Sala, C., Tadic, M., Gherbesi, E., Grassi, G., et al. (2017). Renal artery stenosis and left ventricular hypertrophy: an updated review and meta-analysis of echocardiographic studies. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 35(12), 2339-2345 [10.1097/HJH.0000000000001500].

Renal artery stenosis and left ventricular hypertrophy: an updated review and meta-analysis of echocardiographic studies.

Cuspidi, C
;
Dell'Oro, R;Grassi, G;Mancia, G
2017

Abstract

Aim: Data on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS) and its regression following renal revascularization are scanty. We performed a meta-analysis to provide comprehensive information on this clinically relevant issue. Methods: Full articles providing data on: LVH, as assessed by echocardiography, in RAS patients as compared with essential hypertensive counterparts; changes of left ventricular (LV) mass index after renal artery revascularization were considered. Results: A total of 905 study participants (RAS=446, essential hypertensive=459) of both sex were included in nine studies. Pooled LV mass index was higher in RAS than in essential hypertensive patients (140.4±11.1g/m 2 versus 121.8±6.2g/m 2, standard mean difference being 0.41±0.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.51, P<0.001]. Among 360 RAS patients undergone renal revascularization from eight studies, baseline and post-intervention pooled mean LV mass index values were 129.0±10.2g/m 2 and 115.5±9.9g/m 2, respectively, the standard mean difference being-0.36±0.06 (95% CI from -0.47 to -0.25, P<0.001). These findings were unaffected by publication bias or single study effect. Conclusion: Our meta-analysis indicates that RAS patients have an increased likelihood of LVH compared with essential hypertensive counterparts and renal artery revascularization has a beneficial effect on LV structure, as reflected by a significant decrease in LV mass index.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Renal artery stenosis and left ventricular hypertrophy
English
2017
35
12
2339
2345
none
Cuspidi, C., Dell'Oro, R., Sala, C., Tadic, M., Gherbesi, E., Grassi, G., et al. (2017). Renal artery stenosis and left ventricular hypertrophy: an updated review and meta-analysis of echocardiographic studies. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 35(12), 2339-2345 [10.1097/HJH.0000000000001500].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/164982
Citazioni
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
Social impact