The empirical study of defense mechanisms has taken place in relative isolation, with few connections to other fields deriving from psychodynamic theories, including attachment. This study aimed to explore the associations of remembered childhood caregiving and defense mechanisms with adult attachment styles in a nonclinical sample. Furthermore, we investigated which defenses are associated with specific insecure attachment styles. Participants were 238 university students (mean age = 28.11 years, SD = 9.42; 24.4% male) who volunteered to complete a set of questionnaires including the Response Evaluation Measure-71, the Attachment Style Questionnaire, and the Measure of Parenting Style. The main contribution to adult attachment style is given by immature defenses, which are associated with all dimensions of insecure attachment, and inversely related to secure attachment. Mature defenses seemed to play a secondary role because they predicted only secure attachment significantly. Maternal and paternal rearing style showed no significant effect on attachment scores, with the only exception of paternal abuse on need for approval and maternal overprotection on preoccupation with relationships and relationships as secondary. Splitting and repression emerged as mechanisms that characterized the avoidant dimension of insecure attachment, whereas the anxious dimension of attachment showed associations with projection and fantasy. The results support the hypothesis that immature defenses are a correlate of insecure attachment in adults and that specific defense configurations are associated with the avoidant and anxious components of attachment.

Prunas, A., DI PIERRO, R., Huemer, J., Tagini, A. (2019). Defense mechanisms, remembered parental caregiving, and adult attachment style. PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 36(1), 64-72 [10.1037/pap0000158].

Defense mechanisms, remembered parental caregiving, and adult attachment style

PRUNAS, ANTONIO
;
DI PIERRO, ROSSELLA;TAGINI, ANGELA
2019

Abstract

The empirical study of defense mechanisms has taken place in relative isolation, with few connections to other fields deriving from psychodynamic theories, including attachment. This study aimed to explore the associations of remembered childhood caregiving and defense mechanisms with adult attachment styles in a nonclinical sample. Furthermore, we investigated which defenses are associated with specific insecure attachment styles. Participants were 238 university students (mean age = 28.11 years, SD = 9.42; 24.4% male) who volunteered to complete a set of questionnaires including the Response Evaluation Measure-71, the Attachment Style Questionnaire, and the Measure of Parenting Style. The main contribution to adult attachment style is given by immature defenses, which are associated with all dimensions of insecure attachment, and inversely related to secure attachment. Mature defenses seemed to play a secondary role because they predicted only secure attachment significantly. Maternal and paternal rearing style showed no significant effect on attachment scores, with the only exception of paternal abuse on need for approval and maternal overprotection on preoccupation with relationships and relationships as secondary. Splitting and repression emerged as mechanisms that characterized the avoidant dimension of insecure attachment, whereas the anxious dimension of attachment showed associations with projection and fantasy. The results support the hypothesis that immature defenses are a correlate of insecure attachment in adults and that specific defense configurations are associated with the avoidant and anxious components of attachment.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
adult attachment; caregiving; defense mechanisms; parenting; self-report;
Adult attachment; Caregiving; Defense mechanisms; Parenting; Self-report; Clinical Psychology
English
27-nov-2017
2019
36
1
64
72
reserved
Prunas, A., DI PIERRO, R., Huemer, J., Tagini, A. (2019). Defense mechanisms, remembered parental caregiving, and adult attachment style. PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 36(1), 64-72 [10.1037/pap0000158].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Prunas et al. 2019_Psychoanalytic Psychology.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 136.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
136.65 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/162250
Citazioni
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
Social impact