The precautionary principle (PP) applied to environmental policy stipulates that, in the presence of uncertainty, society must take robust preventive action to guard against worst-case outcomes. It follows that the higher the degree of uncertainty, the more aggressive this preventive action should be. This normative maxim is explored in the case of a stylized dynamic model of pollution control with uncertain (in the Knightian sense) stock dynamics, using the robust control framework of Hansen and Sargent . [12]. Optimal investment in damage control is found to be increasing in the degree of uncertainty, thus confirming the conventional PP wisdom. Optimal mitigation decisions, however, need not always comport with the PP. In particular, when damage-control investment is both sufficiently cheap and sensitive to changes in uncertainty, damage-control investment and mitigation may act as substitutes and a PP with respect to the latter can be unambiguously irrational. The theoretical results are applied to a calibrated linear-quadratic model of climate change. The analysis suggests that a reversal of the PP with respect to mitigation, while theoretically possible, is very unlikely. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.

Athanasoglou, S., Xepapadeas, A. (2012). Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 63(3), 304-320 [10.1016/j.jeem.2011.11.001].

Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious

ATHANASOGLOU, STERGIOS;
2012

Abstract

The precautionary principle (PP) applied to environmental policy stipulates that, in the presence of uncertainty, society must take robust preventive action to guard against worst-case outcomes. It follows that the higher the degree of uncertainty, the more aggressive this preventive action should be. This normative maxim is explored in the case of a stylized dynamic model of pollution control with uncertain (in the Knightian sense) stock dynamics, using the robust control framework of Hansen and Sargent . [12]. Optimal investment in damage control is found to be increasing in the degree of uncertainty, thus confirming the conventional PP wisdom. Optimal mitigation decisions, however, need not always comport with the PP. In particular, when damage-control investment is both sufficiently cheap and sensitive to changes in uncertainty, damage-control investment and mitigation may act as substitutes and a PP with respect to the latter can be unambiguously irrational. The theoretical results are applied to a calibrated linear-quadratic model of climate change. The analysis suggests that a reversal of the PP with respect to mitigation, while theoretically possible, is very unlikely. © 2011 Elsevier Inc.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Knightian uncertainty; Pollution control; Precautionary principle; Robust control; Stock dynamics; Economics and Econometrics; Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
English
2012
63
3
304
320
none
Athanasoglou, S., Xepapadeas, A. (2012). Pollution control with uncertain stock dynamics: When, and how, to be precautious. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 63(3), 304-320 [10.1016/j.jeem.2011.11.001].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/139987
Citazioni
  • Scopus 81
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 75
Social impact