OBJECTIVE: Author's experience with periduodenal perforation after ERCP and there systematic approach is presented. METHODS: A retrospective study of 6 instances of duodenal perforation related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The study follows these parameters: type of perforations, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, time to diagnosis, methods of management, surgical procedures, length of stay, mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Traditionally duodenal perforation after ERCP has been managed surgically; however in last decade management has been shifted to a more selective approach, but some authors promotes non surgical routine management: the reported death rate of medical treatment is high as 50%. In our experience an aggressive diagnostically and therapeutically management may reduce mortality. The decision to manage patients without surgery is a dynamic one and should undergo frequent reevaluation whenever the clinical circumstances demonstrate even the slightest untoward development. CONCLUSION: A selective management scheme and an aggressive but selective surgical approach may influence overall mortality
Fattori, L., Nespoli, L., Ardito, A., Germini, A., Nespoli, A. (2007). Duodenal perforation post-ERCP: Diagnostically and therapeutic management. ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 78(3), 193-194.
Duodenal perforation post-ERCP: Diagnostically and therapeutic management
NESPOLI, LUCA CARLO;NESPOLI, ANGELO
2007
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Author's experience with periduodenal perforation after ERCP and there systematic approach is presented. METHODS: A retrospective study of 6 instances of duodenal perforation related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The study follows these parameters: type of perforations, clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, time to diagnosis, methods of management, surgical procedures, length of stay, mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Traditionally duodenal perforation after ERCP has been managed surgically; however in last decade management has been shifted to a more selective approach, but some authors promotes non surgical routine management: the reported death rate of medical treatment is high as 50%. In our experience an aggressive diagnostically and therapeutically management may reduce mortality. The decision to manage patients without surgery is a dynamic one and should undergo frequent reevaluation whenever the clinical circumstances demonstrate even the slightest untoward development. CONCLUSION: A selective management scheme and an aggressive but selective surgical approach may influence overall mortalityI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.