Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported restorations has become a successful therapy resulting in high survival rate (SR). Recently, some reports have stated that submerged implants have no differences in SR compared to transmucosal implants. It was also reported that a reduction in timing of implant loading (from 12-24 weeks to 6-8 weeks) does not affect the predictability and SR of the implants. In particular, the reduction of the loading period is well accepted by the full edentulous patient, due to the functional and aesthetic problems related to denture wearing. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the SR of immediate loading implants (ILIs) compared to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the help of computer guided implant dentistry. The aim of this short review is therefore, to assess whether ILIs achieve similar clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols. As stated in preview reviews, we can affirm that there is no difference in SR at ILIs against delayed implants and with respect to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the use of computer guided implant dentistry. Keeping in mind the limitations of the present review, we can affirm that ILIs have a similar SR when compared to conventional loading protocols.

Baj, A., Lo Muzio, L., Lauritano, D., Candotto, V., Mancini, G., Giannì, A. (2016). Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants: A short literature review. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS & HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 30(2), 183-188.

Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants: A short literature review

LAURITANO, DORINA;
2016

Abstract

Oral rehabilitation with implant-supported restorations has become a successful therapy resulting in high survival rate (SR). Recently, some reports have stated that submerged implants have no differences in SR compared to transmucosal implants. It was also reported that a reduction in timing of implant loading (from 12-24 weeks to 6-8 weeks) does not affect the predictability and SR of the implants. In particular, the reduction of the loading period is well accepted by the full edentulous patient, due to the functional and aesthetic problems related to denture wearing. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the SR of immediate loading implants (ILIs) compared to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the help of computer guided implant dentistry. The aim of this short review is therefore, to assess whether ILIs achieve similar clinical outcomes when compared to conventional loading protocols. As stated in preview reviews, we can affirm that there is no difference in SR at ILIs against delayed implants and with respect to placing implants in native bone, with bone graft, in post-extraction sites, with the use of computer guided implant dentistry. Keeping in mind the limitations of the present review, we can affirm that ILIs have a similar SR when compared to conventional loading protocols.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Bone graft; Computer guided implant dentistry; Conventional loading; Immediate loading; Native bone; Post-extraction sites;
conventional loading, immediate loading, native bone, bone graft, post-extraction sites, computer guided implant dentistry
English
2016
30
2
183
188
reserved
Baj, A., Lo Muzio, L., Lauritano, D., Candotto, V., Mancini, G., Giannì, A. (2016). Success of immediate versus standard loaded implants: A short literature review. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS & HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS, 30(2), 183-188.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
274 SUCCESS OF IMMEDIATE VERSUS STANDARD LOADED IMPLANTS.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Dimensione 193.36 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
193.36 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/128989
Citazioni
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
Social impact