In case C-44/14, Spain v. European Parliament and Council, the Court of Justice of the Euro-pean Union has had the opportunity to clarify the scope and effects of the British and Irish opt-out in the Schengen area. The Court held that a limited cooperation with those countries by means of inter-national agreements in an area of the Schengen acquis, that does not apply, notoriously, to Ireland and the United Kingdom, does not infringe Art. 4 of the Schengen Protocol. By upholding the legality of such agreements, the judgment introduces some flexibility in dealing with opt-outs, while at the same time confirming that an unrestrained à la carte approach would not be tolerated
Miglio, A. (2016). Schengen, Differentiated Integration and Cooperation with the ‘Outs’. EUROPEAN PAPERS, 1(1), 139-148 [10.15166/2499-8249/11].
Schengen, Differentiated Integration and Cooperation with the ‘Outs’
MIGLIO, ALBERTO
2016
Abstract
In case C-44/14, Spain v. European Parliament and Council, the Court of Justice of the Euro-pean Union has had the opportunity to clarify the scope and effects of the British and Irish opt-out in the Schengen area. The Court held that a limited cooperation with those countries by means of inter-national agreements in an area of the Schengen acquis, that does not apply, notoriously, to Ireland and the United Kingdom, does not infringe Art. 4 of the Schengen Protocol. By upholding the legality of such agreements, the judgment introduces some flexibility in dealing with opt-outs, while at the same time confirming that an unrestrained à la carte approach would not be toleratedFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
EP_eJ_2016_1_12_Insight_Alberto_Miglio_0.pdf
accesso aperto
Dimensione
157.53 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
157.53 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.