Objective: We sought to evaluate right ventricular (RV) structure and function in hypertensive patients with various left ventricular (LV) geometric patterns using an updated classification for LV geometry. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 232 hypertensive subjects. All the subjects underwent complete two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic examination. Using LV mass index, LV end-diastolic diameter and relative wall thickness, according to the updated classification, all subjects were divided into six different groups: normal LV geometry, concentric remodeling, eccentric LV hypertrophy (LVH), concentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH. Results: RV wall thickness was increased in concentric and concentric-dilated LVH compared with normal LV geometry and LV concentric remodeling. RV longitudinal function was reduced in concentric and concentric-dilated patients compared with other hypertensive groups. 3D RV volumes were significantly higher in eccentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH hypertensive subjects. Conversely, 3D RV ejection fraction was lower in these groups. Conclusion: RV longitudinal myocardial function and 3D RV function are significantly influenced by LV geometry in hypertensive patients. RV remodeling is the most pronounced in the patients with concentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH geometric patterns.

Tadic, M., Cuspidi, C., Vukomanovic, V., Kocijancic, V., Celic, V. (2016). Right ventricular remodeling and updated left ventricular geometry classification: is there any relationship?. BLOOD PRESSURE, 25(5), 292-297 [10.3109/08037051.2016.1172868].

Right ventricular remodeling and updated left ventricular geometry classification: is there any relationship?

CUSPIDI, CESARE
Secondo
;
2016

Abstract

Objective: We sought to evaluate right ventricular (RV) structure and function in hypertensive patients with various left ventricular (LV) geometric patterns using an updated classification for LV geometry. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 232 hypertensive subjects. All the subjects underwent complete two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic examination. Using LV mass index, LV end-diastolic diameter and relative wall thickness, according to the updated classification, all subjects were divided into six different groups: normal LV geometry, concentric remodeling, eccentric LV hypertrophy (LVH), concentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH. Results: RV wall thickness was increased in concentric and concentric-dilated LVH compared with normal LV geometry and LV concentric remodeling. RV longitudinal function was reduced in concentric and concentric-dilated patients compared with other hypertensive groups. 3D RV volumes were significantly higher in eccentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH hypertensive subjects. Conversely, 3D RV ejection fraction was lower in these groups. Conclusion: RV longitudinal myocardial function and 3D RV function are significantly influenced by LV geometry in hypertensive patients. RV remodeling is the most pronounced in the patients with concentric, dilated, and concentric-dilated LVH geometric patterns.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Hypertension; left ventricular geometry; right ventricle; three-dimensional echocardiography; two-dimensional strain;
Hypertension; left ventricular geometry; right ventricle; three-dimensional echocardiography; two-dimensional strain
English
2016
25
5
292
297
none
Tadic, M., Cuspidi, C., Vukomanovic, V., Kocijancic, V., Celic, V. (2016). Right ventricular remodeling and updated left ventricular geometry classification: is there any relationship?. BLOOD PRESSURE, 25(5), 292-297 [10.3109/08037051.2016.1172868].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/110012
Citazioni
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
Social impact