The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains

Ubertazzi, B. (2012). Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE LAW, 3/2012, 213-249.

Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association

UBERTAZZI, BENEDETTA CARLA ANGELA MARIA
2012

Abstract

The following comparison was written for the first meeting of the International Law Association newly established (2010) Committee on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Chair: Professor Toshiyuki Kono, Kyushu University; Co-Rapporteurs: Professors Pedro de Miguel Asensio, Madrid Complutense University, and Axel Metzger, Hannover University) (hereinafter: ILA Committee), which was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Lisbon in March 16-17, 2012. The comparison at stake concerns the rules on infringement and exclusive (subject-mater) jurisdiction posed (or rejected, in case of exclusive jurisdiction) by four sets of academic principles. Notwithstanding the fact that the rules in question present several differences, those differences in the majority of cases could be overcome by further studies and work of the ILA Committee, as the following comparison explains
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction Infringement Jurisdiction Territoriality Ubiquity Intellectual Property Exclusive (subject-matter) Jurisdiction Validity Inter Partes Effects
English
2012
3/2012
213
249
open
Ubertazzi, B. (2012). Infringement and Exclusive Jurisdiction in Intellectual Property: a Comparison for the International Law Association. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE LAW, 3/2012, 213-249.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ubertazzi-infringement.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 651.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
651.4 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/102504
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact