The role of glutamine (GLN) supplementation in critically ill patients is controversial. Our aim was to analyze its potential effect in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). We performed a systematic literature review through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane-Controlled Trials Register searching for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1983 to 2014 and comparing GLN supplementation to no supplementation in patients admitted to ICU. A random-effect meta-analysis for each outcome (hospital and ICU mortality and rate of infections) of interest was carried out. The effect size was estimated by the risk ratio (RR). Thirty RCTs were analyzed with a total of 3696 patients, 1825 (49.4%) receiving GLN and 1859 (50.6%) no GLN (control groups). Hospital mortality rate was 27.6% in the GLN patients and 28.6% in controls with an RR of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.81-1.07; P = 0.325, I<sup>2</sup> = 10.7%). ICU mortality was 18.0 % in the patients receiving GLN and 17.6% in controls with an RR of 1.01 (95% CI= 0.86-1.19; P = 0.932, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The incidence of infections was 39.7% in GLN group versus 41.7% in controls. The effect of GLN was not significant (RR=0.88; 95% CI=0.76-1.03; P =0.108, I<sup>2</sup> =56.1%). These results do not allow to recommend GLN supplementation in a generic population of critically ills. Further RCTs are needed to explore the effect of GLN in more specific cohort of patients.

Oldani, M., Sandini, M., Nespoli, L., Coppola, S., Bernasconi, D., Gianotti, L. (2015). Glutamine supplementation in intensive care patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. MEDICINE, 94(31) [10.1097/MD.0000000000001319].

Glutamine supplementation in intensive care patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Oldani, M;Sandini, M;Nespoli, L;Coppola, S;Bernasconi, D;Gianotti, L
2015

Abstract

The role of glutamine (GLN) supplementation in critically ill patients is controversial. Our aim was to analyze its potential effect in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). We performed a systematic literature review through Medline, Embase, Pubmed, Scopus, Ovid, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane-Controlled Trials Register searching for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published from 1983 to 2014 and comparing GLN supplementation to no supplementation in patients admitted to ICU. A random-effect meta-analysis for each outcome (hospital and ICU mortality and rate of infections) of interest was carried out. The effect size was estimated by the risk ratio (RR). Thirty RCTs were analyzed with a total of 3696 patients, 1825 (49.4%) receiving GLN and 1859 (50.6%) no GLN (control groups). Hospital mortality rate was 27.6% in the GLN patients and 28.6% in controls with an RR of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.81-1.07; P = 0.325, I2 = 10.7%). ICU mortality was 18.0 % in the patients receiving GLN and 17.6% in controls with an RR of 1.01 (95% CI= 0.86-1.19; P = 0.932, I2 = 0%). The incidence of infections was 39.7% in GLN group versus 41.7% in controls. The effect of GLN was not significant (RR=0.88; 95% CI=0.76-1.03; P =0.108, I2 =56.1%). These results do not allow to recommend GLN supplementation in a generic population of critically ills. Further RCTs are needed to explore the effect of GLN in more specific cohort of patients.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Critical Illness; Glutamine; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Critical Care; Dietary Supplements; Medicine (all)
English
2015
94
31
e1319
none
Oldani, M., Sandini, M., Nespoli, L., Coppola, S., Bernasconi, D., Gianotti, L. (2015). Glutamine supplementation in intensive care patients: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. MEDICINE, 94(31) [10.1097/MD.0000000000001319].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/101272
Citazioni
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
Social impact