In the original version of this article, some typos regarding the adjustment coefficients for raw MoCA-Visuo-spatial (MoCA-VS) and MoCA-Attention (MoCA-A) scores (Table 3) were present and have now been amended (amended MoCA-VS cell: age=35, education=8; amended MoCA-A cells: age=55, education=8; age=35, education=13). Moreover, some imprecisions regarding the discussion of the discrepancies between the present and previous normative studies have been amended (page 379, Discussion: "More specifically, ESs allotments here reported proved to be stricter than those of Santangelo et al.’s [1] with regard to MoCA-total, -VS, -EF and -A, whereas less strict with regard to MoCA-O and Conti et al.’s [2] total"). We are thankful to the Researcher that has drawn our attention on such elements. The updated Table 3 is below: (Table presented.) Adjustment grids according to age and education for MoCA total and subtest raw scores Sub-test Education Age 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Total 5 ...
Aiello, E., Gramegna, C., Esposito, A., Gazzaniga, V., Zago, S., Difonzo, T., et al. (2023). Correction to: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): updated norms and psychometric insights into adaptive testing from healthy individuals in Northern Italy (Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, (2021), 34, 2, (375-382), 10.1007/s40520-021-01943-7) [Altro] [10.1007/s40520-023-02509-5].
Correction to: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): updated norms and psychometric insights into adaptive testing from healthy individuals in Northern Italy (Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, (2021), 34, 2, (375-382), 10.1007/s40520-021-01943-7)
Aiello E. N.;Gramegna C.;Maddaluno O.;Appollonio I.;Bolognini N.
2023
Abstract
In the original version of this article, some typos regarding the adjustment coefficients for raw MoCA-Visuo-spatial (MoCA-VS) and MoCA-Attention (MoCA-A) scores (Table 3) were present and have now been amended (amended MoCA-VS cell: age=35, education=8; amended MoCA-A cells: age=55, education=8; age=35, education=13). Moreover, some imprecisions regarding the discussion of the discrepancies between the present and previous normative studies have been amended (page 379, Discussion: "More specifically, ESs allotments here reported proved to be stricter than those of Santangelo et al.’s [1] with regard to MoCA-total, -VS, -EF and -A, whereas less strict with regard to MoCA-O and Conti et al.’s [2] total"). We are thankful to the Researcher that has drawn our attention on such elements. The updated Table 3 is below: (Table presented.) Adjustment grids according to age and education for MoCA total and subtest raw scores Sub-test Education Age 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Total 5 ...| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
unpaywall-bitstream-5742017.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
401.91 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
401.91 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


