In Table 3 (Analysis of variance for the interaction model of the responses). The P-value of SF response has been changed, since SF and GF were reported with the same P-value column. The correct table as shown below: In Table 4 (Estimated effects and standard error (SE) calculated through the three central experiments), Student's t values were calculated at 2 degrees of freedom. Therefore all the t in Table 4 should appear with this notation t(2,0.05) × SE as shown below:
Mangili, I., Oliveri, M., Anzano, M., Collina, E., Pitea, D., Lasagni, M. (2015). Corrigendum: “Full factorial experimental design to study the devulcanization of ground tire rubber in supercritical carbon dioxide” [J. Supercrit. Fluids 92 (2014) 249–256] (S0896844614001570) (10.1016/j.supflu.2014.06.001)) [Altro] [10.1016/j.supflu.2015.05.022].
Corrigendum: “Full factorial experimental design to study the devulcanization of ground tire rubber in supercritical carbon dioxide” [J. Supercrit. Fluids 92 (2014) 249–256] (S0896844614001570) (10.1016/j.supflu.2014.06.001))
Mangili I.;Oliveri M.;Anzano M.;Collina E.;Pitea D.;Lasagni M.
2015
Abstract
In Table 3 (Analysis of variance for the interaction model of the responses). The P-value of SF response has been changed, since SF and GF were reported with the same P-value column. The correct table as shown below: In Table 4 (Estimated effects and standard error (SE) calculated through the three central experiments), Student's t values were calculated at 2 degrees of freedom. Therefore all the t in Table 4 should appear with this notation t(2,0.05) × SE as shown below:
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
