Mandatory disclosure of evidence and double jeopardy are considered to be among the most important bulwarks against prosecutorial misconducts. While protecting the generality of defendants in the criminal process, we show that under certain reasonable assumptions, these procedural mechanisms hurt innocent defendants by inducing prosecutors to adjust their behavior and thus triggering adverse practices. Download Info
Gauropa, N., Rizzolli, M. (2008). Why Pro-Defendant Criminal Procedure Might Hurt the Innocent [Working paper del dipartimento].
Why Pro-Defendant Criminal Procedure Might Hurt the Innocent
RIZZOLLI, MATTEO
2008
Abstract
Mandatory disclosure of evidence and double jeopardy are considered to be among the most important bulwarks against prosecutorial misconducts. While protecting the generality of defendants in the criminal process, we show that under certain reasonable assumptions, these procedural mechanisms hurt innocent defendants by inducing prosecutors to adjust their behavior and thus triggering adverse practices. Download Info
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Why_Pro_Defendant_Criminal_Procedure.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Other attachments
Dimensione
1.09 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.09 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
