We investigated whether the type of stimulus (pictures of static faces vs. body motion) contributes differently to the recognition of emotions. The performance (accuracy and response times) of 25 Low Autistic Traits (LAT group) young adults (21 males) and 20 young adults (16 males) with either High Autistic Traits or with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder (HAT group) was compared in the recognition of four emotions (Happiness, Anger, Fear, and Sadness) either shown in static faces or conveyed by moving body patch-light displays (PLDs). Overall, HAT individuals were as accurate as LAT ones in perceiving emotions both with faces and with PLDs. Moreover, they correctly described non-emotional actions depicted by PLDs, indicating that they perceived the motion conveyed by the PLDs per se. For LAT participants, happiness proved to be the easiest emotion to be recognized: in line with previous studies we found a happy face advantage for faces, which for the first time was also found for bodies (happy body advantage). Furthermore, LAT participants recognized sadness better by static faces and fear by PLDs. This advantage for motion kinematics in the recognition of fear was not present in HAT participants, suggesting that (i) emotion recognition is not generally impaired in HAT individuals, (ii) the cues exploited for emotion recognition by LAT and HAT groups are not always the same. These findings are discussed against the background of emotional processing in typically and atypically developed individuals.

ACTIS GROSSO, R., Bossi, F., Ricciardelli, P. (2015). Emotion recognition through static faces and moving bodies: A comparison between typically developed adults and individuals with high level of autistic traits. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 6(October) [10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01570].

Emotion recognition through static faces and moving bodies: A comparison between typically developed adults and individuals with high level of autistic traits

ACTIS GROSSO, ROSSANA
Primo
;
BOSSI, FRANCESCO
Secondo
;
RICCIARDELLI, PAOLA
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

We investigated whether the type of stimulus (pictures of static faces vs. body motion) contributes differently to the recognition of emotions. The performance (accuracy and response times) of 25 Low Autistic Traits (LAT group) young adults (21 males) and 20 young adults (16 males) with either High Autistic Traits or with High Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder (HAT group) was compared in the recognition of four emotions (Happiness, Anger, Fear, and Sadness) either shown in static faces or conveyed by moving body patch-light displays (PLDs). Overall, HAT individuals were as accurate as LAT ones in perceiving emotions both with faces and with PLDs. Moreover, they correctly described non-emotional actions depicted by PLDs, indicating that they perceived the motion conveyed by the PLDs per se. For LAT participants, happiness proved to be the easiest emotion to be recognized: in line with previous studies we found a happy face advantage for faces, which for the first time was also found for bodies (happy body advantage). Furthermore, LAT participants recognized sadness better by static faces and fear by PLDs. This advantage for motion kinematics in the recognition of fear was not present in HAT participants, suggesting that (i) emotion recognition is not generally impaired in HAT individuals, (ii) the cues exploited for emotion recognition by LAT and HAT groups are not always the same. These findings are discussed against the background of emotional processing in typically and atypically developed individuals.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Asperger Syndrome; Autism Spectrum Conditions; Autism Spectrum Disorders; Biological motion; Emotions recognition; Faces; Point-light displays; Psychology (all)
English
2015
6
October
1570
open
ACTIS GROSSO, R., Bossi, F., Ricciardelli, P. (2015). Emotion recognition through static faces and moving bodies: A comparison between typically developed adults and individuals with high level of autistic traits. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 6(October) [10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01570].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-97944.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.77 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.77 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/97944
Citazioni
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
Social impact