In the last twenty years there has been a series of criticisms of the use of Fisher's significance tests and of the Neyman and Pearson test theory. In particular, the p-value that has become a powerful decision tool in affirming the presence of an effect has been criticized. The supremacy of the p-value is mainly due to the attribution of meanings and powers that it does not have, both for its operational simplicity and for the complicity of much of the literature. The paper considers the major criticisms of significance coming from methodological and applied researchers (such as statisticians, psychologists, neurologists and clinicians) and also coming from internationally recognized journals. Naturally, the literature is not limited to criticism and gradually proposes alternative methods to deal with the problems of hypothesis testing; one of these is the Bayesian method that is recently proposed not as an alternative but in sharing with the p-value and other inferential tools. It is precisely this aspect that is explored in the paper, since it is considered not only interesting in itself, but also a possible bridge between the classical and the Bayesian inference school. The paper also includes a stringent methodological appendix, which may help in understanding some definitions and examples.

Marasini, D., Quatto, P. (2021). Sull’inferenza statistica tra passato e presente [On the statistical inference between past and present]. SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI, 32(2), 445-462 [10.1422/96331].

Sull’inferenza statistica tra passato e presente [On the statistical inference between past and present]

Marasini, D;Quatto, P
2021

Abstract

In the last twenty years there has been a series of criticisms of the use of Fisher's significance tests and of the Neyman and Pearson test theory. In particular, the p-value that has become a powerful decision tool in affirming the presence of an effect has been criticized. The supremacy of the p-value is mainly due to the attribution of meanings and powers that it does not have, both for its operational simplicity and for the complicity of much of the literature. The paper considers the major criticisms of significance coming from methodological and applied researchers (such as statisticians, psychologists, neurologists and clinicians) and also coming from internationally recognized journals. Naturally, the literature is not limited to criticism and gradually proposes alternative methods to deal with the problems of hypothesis testing; one of these is the Bayesian method that is recently proposed not as an alternative but in sharing with the p-value and other inferential tools. It is precisely this aspect that is explored in the paper, since it is considered not only interesting in itself, but also a possible bridge between the classical and the Bayesian inference school. The paper also includes a stringent methodological appendix, which may help in understanding some definitions and examples.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Bayes factor; p-value; prior probability; rejection odds; significance;
English
Italian
2021
32
2
445
462
none
Marasini, D., Quatto, P. (2021). Sull’inferenza statistica tra passato e presente [On the statistical inference between past and present]. SISTEMI INTELLIGENTI, 32(2), 445-462 [10.1422/96331].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/301294
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact