Background: We aimed to investigate the extent of the agreement on practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. Methods: Investigators from 67 Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study centers completed several questionnaires (response rate: 99%). Results: Regarding practices around brain death, we found agreement on the clinical evaluation (prerequisites and neurological assessment) for brain death determination (BDD) in 100% of the centers. However, ancillary tests were required for BDD in 64% of the centers. BDD for nondonor patients was deemed mandatory in 18% of the centers before withdrawing life-sustaining measures (LSM). Also, practices around postmortem organ donation varied. Organ donation after circulatory arrest was forbidden in 45% of the centers. When withdrawal of LSM was contemplated, in 67% of centers the patients with a ventricular drain in situ had this removed, either sometimes or all of the time. Conclusions: This study showed both agreement and some regional differences regarding practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. We hope our results help quantify and understand potential differences, and provide impetus for current dialogs toward further harmonization of practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation.

van Veen, E., van der Jagt, M., Cnossen, M., Maas, A., de Beaufort, I., Menon, D., et al. (2018). Brain death and postmortem organ donation: Report of a questionnaire from the CENTER-TBI study. CRITICAL CARE, 22(1), 306 [10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4].

Brain death and postmortem organ donation: Report of a questionnaire from the CENTER-TBI study

Citerio, Giuseppe;
2018

Abstract

Background: We aimed to investigate the extent of the agreement on practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. Methods: Investigators from 67 Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study centers completed several questionnaires (response rate: 99%). Results: Regarding practices around brain death, we found agreement on the clinical evaluation (prerequisites and neurological assessment) for brain death determination (BDD) in 100% of the centers. However, ancillary tests were required for BDD in 64% of the centers. BDD for nondonor patients was deemed mandatory in 18% of the centers before withdrawing life-sustaining measures (LSM). Also, practices around postmortem organ donation varied. Organ donation after circulatory arrest was forbidden in 45% of the centers. When withdrawal of LSM was contemplated, in 67% of centers the patients with a ventricular drain in situ had this removed, either sometimes or all of the time. Conclusions: This study showed both agreement and some regional differences regarding practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation. We hope our results help quantify and understand potential differences, and provide impetus for current dialogs toward further harmonization of practices around brain death and postmortem organ donation.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Brain death; Ethics; Postmortem organ donation; Traumatic brain injury; Ventricular drainage; Withdrawing life-sustaining measures;
Traumatic brain injury, Brain death, Ethics, Postmortem organ donation, Withdrawing life-sustaining measures, Ventricular drainage
English
2018
22
1
306
306
open
van Veen, E., van der Jagt, M., Cnossen, M., Maas, A., de Beaufort, I., Menon, D., et al. (2018). Brain death and postmortem organ donation: Report of a questionnaire from the CENTER-TBI study. CRITICAL CARE, 22(1), 306 [10.1186/s13054-018-2241-4].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Critical Care 2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 400.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
400.75 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/210589
Citazioni
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
Social impact