Purpose: To evaluate fluid reflux, when disconnecting syringe, for different needleless connectors. Materials: Nine connectors were tested; 540 measurements were carried out. Results: The connectors tested showed very different performances, about reflux, on disconnection of the syringe used for flushing. The calculated reflux volumes are: Max Zero® - BD: 6.90 (±2.47) mm3; MicroClave Clear® - ICU Medical: 6.14 (±1.46) mm3; Bionecteur® - Vygon: 1.24(±0.73) mm3; Neutron® - ICU Medical: 0.12 (±0.15) mm3; SmartSite® Carefusion: 33.51 (±11.50) mm3; Safe Plus® - Cremascoli: 23.54 (±3.56) mm3; NeutraClear® - Cair: 9.36 (±1.87) mm3; NeutroX® - Cair: 0.33 (±0.31) mm3; Dasa® BTC: 2.38 (±1.67) mm3. Differences between investigated devices were statistically significant (p<0.001). Discussion: It is difficult to establish the best quality-price ratio for needleless connectors. It is important to consider several variable factors: continuous or discontinuous infusion, catheter type, usage environment and caliber of catheter used. It would therefore be useful to have an indication of the intraluminal space potentially affected by blood reflux in relation to a specific device. Conclusions: Needleless connector is one of the main factors involved in keeping catheter patency. It is important to perform the best choice among the connectors available. An empirical reflux measurement, relative to the needleless connector and the catheter in use, can be obtained using an 18G cannula.

Elli, S., Abbruzzese, C., Cannizzo, L., Lucchini, A. (2016). In vitro evaluation of fluid reflux after flushing different types of needleless connectors. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 17(5), 429-434 [10.5301/jva.5000583].

In vitro evaluation of fluid reflux after flushing different types of needleless connectors

Elli, Stefano
;
Abbruzzese, Chiara;Lucchini, Alberto
2016

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate fluid reflux, when disconnecting syringe, for different needleless connectors. Materials: Nine connectors were tested; 540 measurements were carried out. Results: The connectors tested showed very different performances, about reflux, on disconnection of the syringe used for flushing. The calculated reflux volumes are: Max Zero® - BD: 6.90 (±2.47) mm3; MicroClave Clear® - ICU Medical: 6.14 (±1.46) mm3; Bionecteur® - Vygon: 1.24(±0.73) mm3; Neutron® - ICU Medical: 0.12 (±0.15) mm3; SmartSite® Carefusion: 33.51 (±11.50) mm3; Safe Plus® - Cremascoli: 23.54 (±3.56) mm3; NeutraClear® - Cair: 9.36 (±1.87) mm3; NeutroX® - Cair: 0.33 (±0.31) mm3; Dasa® BTC: 2.38 (±1.67) mm3. Differences between investigated devices were statistically significant (p<0.001). Discussion: It is difficult to establish the best quality-price ratio for needleless connectors. It is important to consider several variable factors: continuous or discontinuous infusion, catheter type, usage environment and caliber of catheter used. It would therefore be useful to have an indication of the intraluminal space potentially affected by blood reflux in relation to a specific device. Conclusions: Needleless connector is one of the main factors involved in keeping catheter patency. It is important to perform the best choice among the connectors available. An empirical reflux measurement, relative to the needleless connector and the catheter in use, can be obtained using an 18G cannula.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Blood; Catheter; Connector; Needleless; Occlusion; Reflux;
Blood; Catheter; Connector; Needleless; Occlusion; Reflux; Catheter Obstruction; Catheterization, Peripheral; Equipment Design; Equipment Failure; Materials Testing; Catheters, Indwelling; Syringes; Vascular Access Devices; Surgery; Nephrology
English
2016
17
5
429
434
none
Elli, S., Abbruzzese, C., Cannizzo, L., Lucchini, A. (2016). In vitro evaluation of fluid reflux after flushing different types of needleless connectors. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 17(5), 429-434 [10.5301/jva.5000583].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/196290
Citazioni
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
Social impact