Background and purpose In clinical applications of Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy (PT-PET), detection and interpretation of inconsistencies between Measured PET and Expected PET are mostly limited by Measured PET noise, due to low count statistics, and by Expected PET bias, especially due to inaccurate washout modelling in off-line implementations. In this work, a recently proposed 4D Maximum Likelihood (ML) reconstruction algorithm which considers Measured PET and Expected PET as two different motion phases of a 4D dataset is assessed on clinical 4D PET-CT datasets acquired after carbon ion therapy. Material and methods The 4D ML reconstruction algorithm estimates: (1) Measured PET of enhanced image quality with respect to the conventional Measured PET, thanks to the exploitation of Expected PET; (2) the deformation field mapping the Expected PET onto the Measured PET as a measure of the occurred displacements. Results Results demonstrate the desired sensitivity to inconsistencies due to breathing motion and/or setup modification, robustness to noise in different count statistics scenarios, but a limited sensitivity to Expected PET washout inaccuracy. Conclusions The 4D ML reconstruction algorithm supports clinical 4D PT-PET in ion beam therapy. The limited sensitivity to washout inaccuracy can be detected and potentially overcome.

Gianoli, C., DE BERNARDI, E., Ricotti, R., Kurz, C., Bauer, J., Riboldi, M., et al. (2017). First clinical investigation of a 4D maximum likelihood reconstruction for 4D PET-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 123(3), 339-345 [10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.018].

First clinical investigation of a 4D maximum likelihood reconstruction for 4D PET-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy

DE BERNARDI, ELISABETTA
Secondo
;
2017

Abstract

Background and purpose In clinical applications of Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy (PT-PET), detection and interpretation of inconsistencies between Measured PET and Expected PET are mostly limited by Measured PET noise, due to low count statistics, and by Expected PET bias, especially due to inaccurate washout modelling in off-line implementations. In this work, a recently proposed 4D Maximum Likelihood (ML) reconstruction algorithm which considers Measured PET and Expected PET as two different motion phases of a 4D dataset is assessed on clinical 4D PET-CT datasets acquired after carbon ion therapy. Material and methods The 4D ML reconstruction algorithm estimates: (1) Measured PET of enhanced image quality with respect to the conventional Measured PET, thanks to the exploitation of Expected PET; (2) the deformation field mapping the Expected PET onto the Measured PET as a measure of the occurred displacements. Results Results demonstrate the desired sensitivity to inconsistencies due to breathing motion and/or setup modification, robustness to noise in different count statistics scenarios, but a limited sensitivity to Expected PET washout inaccuracy. Conclusions The 4D ML reconstruction algorithm supports clinical 4D PT-PET in ion beam therapy. The limited sensitivity to washout inaccuracy can be detected and potentially overcome.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
4D ML reconstruction; 4D PET imaging; Ion beam therapy; PT-PET; Treatment verification
English
2017
123
3
339
345
none
Gianoli, C., DE BERNARDI, E., Ricotti, R., Kurz, C., Bauer, J., Riboldi, M., et al. (2017). First clinical investigation of a 4D maximum likelihood reconstruction for 4D PET-based treatment verification in ion beam therapy. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 123(3), 339-345 [10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.018].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/152006
Citazioni
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
Social impact