Ranking alternatives based on multidimensional welfare indices depends, sometimes critically, on how the different dimensions of welfare are weighted. In this paper, a theoretical framework is presented that yields a set of consensus rankings in the presence of such weight imprecision. The main idea is to consider a vector of weights as an imaginary voter submitting preferences over alternatives. With this voting construct in mind, the well-known Kemeny rule from social choice theory is introduced as a means of aggregating the preferences of many plausible choices of weights, suitably weighted by the importance attached to them. The axiomatic characterization of Kemeny’s rule due to Young and Levenglick (1978) and Young (1988) extends to the present context. An analytic solution is derived for an interesting special case of the model corresponding to generalized weighted means and the $$epsilon $$ϵ-contamination framework of Bayesian statistics. The model is applied to the ARWU index of Shanghai University. Graph-theoretic insights are shown to facilitate computation significantly.

Athanasoglou, S. (2015). Multidimensional welfare rankings under weight imprecision: a social choice perspective. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 44(4), 719-744 [10.1007/s00355-014-0858-z].

Multidimensional welfare rankings under weight imprecision: a social choice perspective

ATHANASOGLOU, STERGIOS
2015

Abstract

Ranking alternatives based on multidimensional welfare indices depends, sometimes critically, on how the different dimensions of welfare are weighted. In this paper, a theoretical framework is presented that yields a set of consensus rankings in the presence of such weight imprecision. The main idea is to consider a vector of weights as an imaginary voter submitting preferences over alternatives. With this voting construct in mind, the well-known Kemeny rule from social choice theory is introduced as a means of aggregating the preferences of many plausible choices of weights, suitably weighted by the importance attached to them. The axiomatic characterization of Kemeny’s rule due to Young and Levenglick (1978) and Young (1988) extends to the present context. An analytic solution is derived for an interesting special case of the model corresponding to generalized weighted means and the $$epsilon $$ϵ-contamination framework of Bayesian statistics. The model is applied to the ARWU index of Shanghai University. Graph-theoretic insights are shown to facilitate computation significantly.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
C61; D71; D72; I31; Social Sciences (miscellaneous); Economics and Econometrics
English
2015
44
4
719
744
reserved
Athanasoglou, S. (2015). Multidimensional welfare rankings under weight imprecision: a social choice perspective. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 44(4), 719-744 [10.1007/s00355-014-0858-z].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SA_pubs_SCW.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 801.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
801.89 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/139982
Citazioni
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
Social impact