Objectives: The European Glaucoma Prevention Study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of reducing intraocular pressure (IOP), with dorzolamide to prevent or delay patients affected by ocular hypertension from developing primary open-angle glaucoma. Design: Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Participants: Patients (age ≥ 30 years) were enrolled from 18 European centers. The patients fulfilled a series of inclusion criteria including the measurements of IOP (22-29 mmHg), two normal and reliable visual fields (VFs) (on the basis of mean defect and corrected pattern standard deviation/corrected loss of variance of standard 30/11 Humphrey or Octopus perimetry), and normal optic disc as determined by the Optic Disc Reading Center (vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratios; asymmetry between the two eyes ≤ 0.4). Intervention: Patients were randomized to the treatment with dorzolamide or a placebo. Main Outcome Measures: End points are VF and/or optic disc changes. A VF change during the follow-up must be confirmed by two further positive tests. Optic disc change is defined by the agreement of two out of three independent observers evaluating optic disc stereo-slides. Results: One thousand seventy-seven subjects were randomized between January 1, 1997 and May 31, 1999. The mean age was 57.03 ± 10.3 years; 54.41% were women and 99.9% were Caucasian. Mean IOP was 23.6 ± 1.6 mmHg in both eyes. Mean visual acuity was 0.97 ± 0.11 in both eyes; mean refraction was 0.23 ± 1.76 diopters in the right eye and 0.18 ± 1.79 diopters in the left eye. Previous use of medication for ocular hypertension was reported by 38.4% of the patients, systemic hypertension by 28.1%, cardiovascular diseases by 12.9%, and diabetes mellitus by 4.7%. The qualifying VFs were normal and reliable according to protocol criteria. Conclusions: The mean IOP of the patients enrolled in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study is consistent with the estimated mean IOP (within the range of 22-29 mmHg) found in a large sample of the European population. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study should be able to better address the clinical question of whether pharmacological reduction of IOP (by means of dorzolamide) in ocular hypertension patients at moderate risk for developing primary open-angle glaucoma effectively lowers the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Miglior, S., Zeyen, T., Pfeiffer, N., Cunha-Vaz, J., Linsen, M., Pellicci, L., et al. (2002). The European glaucoma prevention study design and baseline description of the participants. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 109(9), 1612-1621 [10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01167-3].

The European glaucoma prevention study design and baseline description of the participants

Miglior S.
Primo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2002

Abstract

Objectives: The European Glaucoma Prevention Study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of reducing intraocular pressure (IOP), with dorzolamide to prevent or delay patients affected by ocular hypertension from developing primary open-angle glaucoma. Design: Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Participants: Patients (age ≥ 30 years) were enrolled from 18 European centers. The patients fulfilled a series of inclusion criteria including the measurements of IOP (22-29 mmHg), two normal and reliable visual fields (VFs) (on the basis of mean defect and corrected pattern standard deviation/corrected loss of variance of standard 30/11 Humphrey or Octopus perimetry), and normal optic disc as determined by the Optic Disc Reading Center (vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratios; asymmetry between the two eyes ≤ 0.4). Intervention: Patients were randomized to the treatment with dorzolamide or a placebo. Main Outcome Measures: End points are VF and/or optic disc changes. A VF change during the follow-up must be confirmed by two further positive tests. Optic disc change is defined by the agreement of two out of three independent observers evaluating optic disc stereo-slides. Results: One thousand seventy-seven subjects were randomized between January 1, 1997 and May 31, 1999. The mean age was 57.03 ± 10.3 years; 54.41% were women and 99.9% were Caucasian. Mean IOP was 23.6 ± 1.6 mmHg in both eyes. Mean visual acuity was 0.97 ± 0.11 in both eyes; mean refraction was 0.23 ± 1.76 diopters in the right eye and 0.18 ± 1.79 diopters in the left eye. Previous use of medication for ocular hypertension was reported by 38.4% of the patients, systemic hypertension by 28.1%, cardiovascular diseases by 12.9%, and diabetes mellitus by 4.7%. The qualifying VFs were normal and reliable according to protocol criteria. Conclusions: The mean IOP of the patients enrolled in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study is consistent with the estimated mean IOP (within the range of 22-29 mmHg) found in a large sample of the European population. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study should be able to better address the clinical question of whether pharmacological reduction of IOP (by means of dorzolamide) in ocular hypertension patients at moderate risk for developing primary open-angle glaucoma effectively lowers the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Double-Blind Method; Europe; Female; Glaucoma, Open-Angle; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Male; Middle Aged; Ocular Hypertension; Research Design; Safety; Sulfonamides; Thiophenes; Visual Acuity; Visual Field Tests; Visual Fields
English
2002
109
9
1612
1621
none
Miglior, S., Zeyen, T., Pfeiffer, N., Cunha-Vaz, J., Linsen, M., Pellicci, L., et al. (2002). The European glaucoma prevention study design and baseline description of the participants. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 109(9), 1612-1621 [10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01167-3].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/104228
Citazioni
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 78
Social impact